Sunday, June 17, 2012

Fatherless Father's Day

I have always known I wanted to be a mom.  After years of waiting - waiting to meet the man that I would marry, the man who would be the father of my children - I realized that I couldn't wait any longer.  I was going to have to become a mother by myself, a single mom by choice.  Deciding to use a donor to have my child was not easy nor was it a choice I made lightly.  I had thought about adopting and for years had planned to adopt if I didn't meet someone.  That was, until I realized just how hard it is to adopt, especially as a single woman.  After a lot of very disappointing research, I ultimately decided that if I wanted to become a mom, my best option was to try to have a baby on my own.

Before Finn was born, before he was even conceived, I wondered what he would think about not having a father, and more specifically, how he would feel about being donor conceived.  Most of the research I did reassured me that as long as I was open and honest with him about his origins, he'd be ok.  Some people even suggested that he might not miss what he never had.  I'm still not too sure I believe that, but in the end, I felt I was making a good decision.

Still, I wondered if he would want to know about his genetic origins.  Would it be a passing thought from time to time, or something he would be consumed with?  I have a baby picture, a voice recording and some essays - would that answer his questions?  I've connected with the mother of one donor sibling, and would be willing to search for more on the Donor Sibling Registry if he decided he wanted to meet some of his donor siblings one day.  Maybe that would be satisfy his curiosity.  I don't know, but I do know that I'll be open to those questions if he has them, and make sure he always knows he can talk to me about these things without hurting my feelings.

In the meantime, while he's too young to have these questions, I see my job as the same as every parent out there: to make sure that he feels loved, safe and secure.  To encourage him to explore the world and to make strong connections with our family and friends so he can start to understand who he is and discover his place in the world.

I've been very interested to read the essays on the new website AnonymousUs.org. It's a website created for both donors, children of donors and parents of donor children to post anonymously about their experiences.  I first heard about it when a single mom friend of mine posted this Huffington Post article by Elizabeth Marquardt on our discussion board.  Marquardt is one of the authors of My Daddy's Name is Donor, a study looking at donor conceived children.

This is a fascinating, albeit limited, study.  I won't pretend to have read it all, but I have read quite a bit of it, and have a few comments on what I've read.  Unlike the traditional scientific paper that reports their methods in a clearly marked section towards the beginning, you have to search through the report to find out exactly how they did the study, so I could be wrong on the details.  It appears to be based on a questionnaire given to donor conceived children (using adopted children and children raised by their biological parents as controls).  This may be the easiest way to a study like this, but it does have limitations.  Just because someone answered yes to a question doesn't mean it's something that they worry about all the time - but the authors think it does based on the subject headings of their 15 major findings.  Here's an excerpt:

2. Family relationships for donor offspring are more often characterized by confusion, tension, and loss.
More than half (53 percent) agree, “I have worried that if I try to get more information about or have a relationship with my sperm donor, my mother and/or the father who raised me would feel angry or hurt.” Seventy percent agree, “I find myself wondering what my sperm donor’s family is like,” and 69 percent agree, “I sometimes wonder if my sperm donor’s parents would want to know me.”
Nearly half of donor offspring (48 percent) compared to about a fifth of adopted adults (19 percent) agree, “When I see friends with their biological fathers and mothers, it makes me feel sad.” Similarly, more than half of donor offspring (53 percent, compared to 29 percent of the adopted adults) agree, “It hurts when I hear other people talk about their genealogical background.”
There's no mention of any possibility of answering anything more than yes or no to these particular questions.  So it's impossible to tell if these are thoughts that these children are obsessed with, or just passing thoughts that they have every now and then.  I believe that's a significant difference.  

Just as interesting is the section later on in the report that talks about how donor conceived children are more likely to be egg or sperm donors themselves, and that their attitudes about assisted reproductive technology and gamete donate are much more open than children of adoptive or biological parents.  If these children truly felt so cheated by being donor conceived, wouldn't the opposite be true?

This study creates more questions than it answers.  Good questions, important questions for those of us who have donor conceived children.  It's a good starting place for understanding how choosing to use a donor may affect future children, but drawing concrete conclusions from the results is impossible.  And being able to apply the results to every child or every family is impossible, too.  Impossible, but that doesn't stop Elizabeth Marquardt from doing just that.

Marquardt suggests that all donor conceived children are unhappy.  Her Huffington Post article leads with a few excerpts from unhappy donor conceived children, and goes on to quote more unhappy children.  What she doesn't mention is that many of those quotes are from children who didn't find out they were donor conceived until they were older.  (The most painful posts to read on AnonymousUs are the ones written by children who found out in their teens or later; it's clear they've been deeply wounded by the deception.)  She completely ignored the essays from donor conceived children who were ok with the decisions their parents made; she didn't even mention those at all. 

But worst of all, she concludes with the statement "Fathers matter. For everyone."  

Well, of course they do. By making the decision to be single mothers by choice, we aren't saying that fathers don't matter, or that men don't matter.  Most of us are keenly aware of the need for male influence in our children's lives and make every effort to find men to fill that role.  

Having a child via donor sperm as a single woman is not an ideal situation.  (Nor, I would imagine) is it an ideal situation for those couples who have to use a donor due to male factor infertility.)  But it is a choice that most of us who have gone this route have made after a lot of careful consideration and planning, and these children are deeply wanted, which is not the case for many children born to biological parents.  

It's a choice that is made out of love.  I look at my little boy and I'm so very happy I made the decision to have him.  He is the most important thing in my world and I'm so thankful to have him. I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that Finn always knows that.  In the end, it's the best I can do.  And I think it will be enough.

18 comments:

  1. There are so many things that I never considered a donor child (or that child's mother) would have to face. I am continually amazed at how you have approached each step of this journey. I wish more people were as thoughtful about their decision to have children.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post. I feel like it's my responsibility to make sure X knows that no matter the way he came into my life, he's loved by everyone around him. And if he's curious, I'll support him 100 percent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're right. Finn will know that he is loved and wanted. Hopefully the genetic connections he is able to make will be enough, but hopefully he will also be wise enough to know that he has a wonderful mom who did not take the decision lightly. Happy Family Day to Finn and you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for your posting. Your very thoughtful post said everything I am thinking. I am on the way to donor insemination in the next week or so and really appreciate reading these blogs and thoughtful insight!

    ReplyDelete
  5. What a great post. Thank you for sharing. It actually characterizes a lot of the thoughts I've had about being a SMC. Prior to having Annelise I had read some of the reports about donor concieved children including the one by Marquardt. If I remember correctly when I did a little digging her data and sampling was very biased. What I've found is that a big part in how the children think of it is how it's presented to them. That's one of the reasons I'm so open about it. I don't want it to ever be seen as a secret or shameful thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like that one Of your readers said happy family day. As a teacher, with students coming from different family situations, I always have to reiterate to the class that not everyone had a mother or father and that we can make for anyone special to us at this time. Sometimes I think not to celebrate the holidays. But in the end I always carry on with observing the parent holidays. I can only Hope that Scarlett's future teachers are sensitive to this fact of different families too and that Scarlett knows how much she was wanted and is loved even without a father.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hmmm. Hadn't read that article and I think I'll skip it! Most ACTUAL sociological research suggests that the "problems" kids have from single parenting is usually a result of poverty, not having one parent (which is generally not an issue with SMC families). And kids from SMC families do better than kids from divorced families...

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's interesting how holildays have such potential to make us feel the exact opposite of their intentiion. I wonder if at any given holiday, half the population isn't joyous. Mother's day always had the potential for disaster for me. And although I wasn't born from a donor egg, I never knew my mother and only have snippets from other people about her. Surprisingly, it didn't matter more on Mother's day then any other day that she wasn't around. If we made stuff in school, I made it for my dad. Because let's face it, he did both roles, just as you will have to do both roles. And he did a great job, just as you are doing a great job! So if my advice counts for anything, don't worry about Father's day. Finn probably won't mind it too much either. And he's got his Grandfather to honor, which is just as important. :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I was reading up on things before becoming a choice mum, I read lots of things that said that it was QUALITY of parenting NOT QUANTITY of parents that was the most important thing. You seem like you are doing a fabulous job so I am sure that Finn is going to be just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have not read the study and based on your post think I will skip it. I agree with what Bilssful Mama said above, its the quality not quantity of parents that evetually counts. A kid of divorced parents being shunted from one parent to another is more likely to have issues than a child brought up in a stable one-parent loving home. SMC's are not the only ones whose children have no fathers, what about kids who are abandoned, or whose father is deceased, or incarcerated, right? To me having a good male role model in my child's life (especially if a boy) is more imporant and that can role be filled by grandfather, uncles, cousins etc. I think Finn has an exceptional support system around him and a loving Mom, so he should do just fine :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow, it seems like that whole study was designed to create the results the author wanted to find. I think it's important to remember that even children from the most "perfect" homes have angst and insecurity about things, too. Maybe if she'd also measured things like academic & professional accomplishments, closeness to the parents who raised them, or their own parenting choices, she would've found some different conclusions.

    A story you might appreciate: one of my closest friends is the child of 2 parents who are developmentally delayed, with physical health issues as well. Everyone thinks it's a miracle they found each other; they're such a perfect match and very happy together. They had fertility issues and conceived A through a sperm donor. A is healthy and of above-average intelligence, with a Masters' Degree (her mom has a h.s. diploma, her dad 10th grade I think). I'm willing to bet she's glad as heck that she didn't get her bio-dad's genes. Also, she is a lesbian, and she and her partner are currently trying to conceive using a sperm donor. So I think she's pretty happy with her parents' decision. There was some issue with ensuring that the donor who conceived her wasn't still donating, so she didn't end up picking him, but I guess that was resolved. Hopefully soon she'll get pregnant, and it'll be a nice happy ending sperm donor story!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great post, Shannon. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thought provoking post but I appreicate your comments regarding the author's bias. In my mind, I tend to liken the creation of donor families to what adoption was decades ago. In closed adoption many children found out by accident or were told when their parents were older and the effects were devastating (and understandably so). The studies on children raised in open adoption proves that no child grows up in a vacuum, that children who are told their stories with honesty and dignity more often than not, grow into well adjusted adults.

    I haven't read this entire study either but on the surface it feels like the "researcher" picked what facts suited her theory and stopped the project right in the middle and claimed it was a success. Of course I am biased too but I find her research flawed. Thank you for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for sharing! Especially the AnnonymousUs website.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Shannon, I wanted to mention this book that I heard about. On this talk radio station I listen to, they interviewed this author- who actually is from MN which is where I am, which I guess is besides the point.... but, the book is called "Donuts for Nan", and basically it was written by a woman who's sister is a single mom by choice, using donor sperm. Her daughters preschool had "donuts with dad" day, and apparently the little girl "Nan" was told by her classmates she couldn't go b/c she didn't have a dad, and other classmates said- wait- you can't not have a dad, etc.... etc.... So, the mom of Nan was talking with her sister about this, and how to deal with it and the sister (Nan's Aunt) started out by writing out the story, her thoughts more as a memoire for Nan but ended up publishing as a children's book. Anyway, I just wanted to mention it. Author just in case is Mary Ryan.
    Ann (from FT-Single Sisters

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think it will be enough too :)
    Very interesting study….

    ReplyDelete
  17. As the mom of two sons by ADI, this is of great interest to me. However, I cannot let it (the excerpts I have read) keep me up at night. I agree with you "these children are deeply wanted, which is not the case for many children born to biological parents".

    I work with adolescents from a range of demographics. From my informal observations, knowing your biological father is not a guarantee of satisfaction or success. Everyone's family of origin is uniquely influential. Some for better, some for worse.

    Most SMC's are well-educated and have made a thoughtful, soul-searching decision. I believe that we are just as good at the parenting puzzle as everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thank you for writing this well articualted post. I am consumed with showing Elena how deeply wanted & loved she is & not let a focus be on that she doesn't have a dad but focus more on that she DOES have a huge number of people who love & care for her plus a donor who was kind & generous enough to give of himself so that she could be created.

    I feel sometimes that with stories like the one you mention, they are looking for the drama, looking to "prove" AR is not good so they skew results to fit the point they're tryng to make because what kind of readership would they get on an article that says donor kids all well adjusted, etc...

    ReplyDelete